Thursday, October 06, 2005

Andy Rooney vs Bush


Every now and then, 60 Minute's Andy Rooney hits a homer:
I'm not really clear how much a billion dollars is but the United States — our United States — is spending $5.6 billion a month fighting this war in Iraq that we never should have gotten into.

We still have 139,000 soldiers in Iraq today.

Almost 2,000 Americans have died there. For what?

Now we have the hurricanes to pay for. One way our government pays for a lot of things is by borrowing from countries like China.

Another way the government is planning to pay for the war and the hurricane damage is by cutting spending for things like Medicare prescriptions, highway construction, farm payments, AMTRAK, National Public Radio and loans to graduate students. Do these sound like the things you'd like to cut back on to pay for Iraq?

I'll tell you where we ought to start saving: on our bloated military establishment.

We're paying for weapons we'll never use.

No other Country spends the kind of money we spend on our military. Last year Japan spent $42 billion. Italy spent $28 billion, Russia spent only $19 billion. The United States spent $455 billion.

We have 8,000 tanks for example. One Abrams tank costs 150 times as much as a Ford station wagon.

We have more than 10,000 nuclear weapons — enough to destroy all of mankind.

We're spending $200 million a year on bullets alone. That's a lot of target practice. We have 1,155,000 enlisted men and women and 225,000 officers. One officer to tell every five enlisted soldier what to do. We have 40,000 colonels alone and 870 generals.

We had a great commander in WWII, Dwight Eisenhower. He became President and on leaving the White House in 1961, he said this: “We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. …"

Well, Ike was right. That's just what’s happened.
Don't ya hate it when that happens?

Wednesday, October 05, 2005

Bushco vs Reality


The Washington Post, in another of its seemingly drug induced takes on the Bush administration, presents an analysis of Bush's latest crony appointment with this headline, Strong Grounding in the Church Could Be a Clue to Miers's Priorities.

Excuse me - "the" church? Did I miss something? Ignoring such trivial differences as Catholic and Protestant, what happened to the Baptists, Methodists, Christian Scientists, Seventh Day Adventists, Lutherans, Episcopalians, Nazarenes, Pentacostals, Unitarians, Congregationalist, Quakers, Menonites, Amish, Shakers, Mormons, Church of Christ, Church of God, Presbyterians, happy Holy Rollers of all persuasians, etc., etc., etc. There is no such thing as the church. If this were the eleventh century perhaps that phrase would make sense. Today one has to ask - what church? What do they believe? Does it make a difference?

Because I can assure you - despite both claiming to be "Christians" - that what a Baptist (Southern or otherwise) believes is not what a Methodist believes. This should be obvious. So why are we given such childish crap as talk about "the" church as if it makes any sense? It doesn't.

Harriet Miers belongs to the Valley View Christian Church of Dallas, TX - one of those independent mega-churches that seems to exist as a unique part of our current fractured world. The head pastor, "Dr." Barry McCarty, has a PhD in Argumentation and Debate, and has been associated with various Baptist and Church of Christ congregations and colleges. What he actually believes now and where he fits on any religious belief continuum is not clear. His church is fundamentalist and conservative - but its website is pretty vague about specific points of doctrine. According to the Post:
At Valley View, pastors preach that abortion is murder, that the Bible is the literal word of God and that homosexuality is a sin -- although they also preach that God loves everybody.
Pretty schizo. This is the church Miers chooses to attend. She was reared a Methodist but was baptised in this church as an adult. So, what does she get here that she didn't get from the Methodist Church? I think we should really care. It is going to make a great difference in our lives if she is confirmed - and I have no wish to be subjected to any more fundamentalist prejudice. This is the Twenty-first Century. Do we really want to relive the Middle Ages?